| : |
|
|
|
People
frequently call and ask us to describe the basic differences between hard-chine and
multi-chine kayaks. They are equally easy to build, although multi-chine boats take about
5 hours longer. Hard-chines originated in the aboriginal skin on frame designs of
Greenland. They have one sharp angle (or chine) on each side of their hulls. Multi-chine
or soft-chine kayaks hail from Alaskan and Canadian waters. They have multiple chines,
with less acute angles. One major performance difference between them lies in their
ability to execute leaned turns.
Multi-Chine Hull
Hard-Chine Hull
Paddlers do leaned turns by leaning the boat outward on a
turn. To turn right, lean left. The opposite from how you lean a bicycle. When upright,
the keel of a kayak tends to keep it going straight. Lean a hard-chine kayak over far
enough, and the chine will start to function as a keel. However, since the chine is
curved, the boat starts to carve a turn. You get some benefit from leaning a multi-chine
kayak while turning. In a hard-chine boat this effect is more pronounced and felt at a
lower angle of heel (in other words, even when leaning less) than in a multi-chine boat.
I designed our new hard-chine Arctic Tern kayak to directly compete with our multi-chine
Osprey Standard and Coho models. Like the Osprey Standard and Coho, the Arctic Tern tracks
well and does a fine job of running down wind in following seas. Paddlers experience all
three kayaks as extremely easy to control and paddle without a rudder. They all make great
boats for extended camping or day trips. The cruising speed and stability for all three
are approximately the same. These are our best selling solo boats. Of the three boats, the
Arctic Tern carves the crispest turns and is the most maneuverable. The Osprey Standard
tracks the strongest and runs down wind the easiest. The Coho displays good
maneuverability, the highest top speed, and the most storage capacity.
Our Queen Charlotte is our most maneuverable boat. The price one pays for this amount of
turning is a tendency to weather cock. She does not track as well as the Arctic Tern, Coho
or solo Ospreys. Extremely buoyant, with enormous secondary stability, she makes a great
choice for people who like to play in surf, want a highly maneuverable boat, and love her
pure Greenland lines with the classic flat deck.
Our sleek Osprey-HP has the fastest top speed in our product line. She is less stable than
the others. She paddles very stiff, like a British boat. If you want a recreational racing
boat, she's dandy.
My computer studies and research into the differences between hard-chine and multi-chine
kayaks show that multi-chines are somewhat more efficient. For example, if the loaded
waterline length (LWL), keel profile, and cumulative stability are held the same, a
multi-chine boat will have about 3.2% less wetted surface and be about 3.2% faster at
cruising speeds. They will have the same top speed, the same upright turning radius, and
the same stability. The hard-chine boat will be a little slower at cruising speeds but
will have a tighter leaned turn. If you hold the initial stability the same, the
difference is more pronounced. The shape of the stability curves differ. The same
cumulative stability to 25 degrees of heel will give you less initial stability and more
secondary stability in a hard-chine hull compared to a round bottom hull.
A designer can trade the efficiency of a multi-chine
hull for more stability instead of more speed. If I hold the wetted surface, LWL, and keel
profile constant, the boats will possess the same cruising speed, top speed, and upright
turning radius, but the hard-chine boat will have less stability.
A skilled designer can design excellent craft in either category. In general, if the two
designs are similar in other respects, multi-chine boats, with more efficient hulls can be
either quicker or more stable. Folks looking for speed often pick a multi-chine hull. For
paddlers who like the performance and feel of hard-chine boats they are the right choice.
Last but not least, between boats of similar performance, paddlers often let aesthetic
preferences finalize the decision. |